Summary: This report extracts mentions of children's rights issues in the reports of the Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please note that the language may have been edited in places for the purpose of clarity.
Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association, Mr. Maina Kiai
_______________________________________________________
A/HRC/26/29
Challenges faced by groups most at risk when exercising or seeking to exercise the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and/or of association
Report Published: 14 April 2014
Mr Kiai identified the following concerns and issued the following recommendations:
Groups at risk/Marginalized groups: As a starting point, the Special Rapporteur acknowledges that groups most at risk share the experience of discrimination, unequal treatment and harassment. He describes those groups based on their level of marginalization in the exercise of the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association. Some of the groups that are considered in the present report to be most at risk are persons with disabilities; youth, including children; women; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) people; members of minority groups; indigenous peoples; internally displaced persons; and non-nationals, including refugees, asylum seekers and migrant workers. (Para. 10)
Non-discrimination: Various international law instruments point to particular principles and measures that States should adopt in order to achieve non-discrimination and equality. For example, States should: (...)Ensure that in all actions concerning children in all spheres, the best interests of the child are a primary consideration; (...) Prohibit the collective expulsion of migrant workers and members of their families and prohibit discriminatory legislation, in particular concerning remuneration, conditions of work and terms of employment (Para. 18)
Article 21 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights recognizes that the right to freedom of peaceful assembly should be enjoyed by everyone, as provided for by article 2 of the Covenant and resolutions 15/21, 21/16 and 24/5 of the Human Rights Council. Importantly, in its resolution 24/5, the Council reminded States of their obligation to respect and fully protect the rights of all individuals to assemble peacefully and associate freely, online as well as offline, including in the context of elections, and including persons espousing minority or dissenting views or beliefs, human rights defenders, trade unionists and others, including migrants, seeking to exercise or to promote those rights. Despite this, some Member States have laws that contain explicitly discriminatory provisions prohibiting assemblies by certain groups. In Malaysia, for example, the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 prohibits people under the age of 21 from organizing a public demonstration. Children under the age of 15 cannot even participate. Migrants and non-citizens may also face undue restrictions on their assembly rights. (Paras. 22-23)
Where a registration regime exists, requirements should be framed such that no one is disadvantaged in the formation of her or his association, either by burdensome procedural requirements or unjustifiable limitations to substantive activities of associations. The State has an obligation to take positive measures to overcome specific challenges that confront marginalized groups, such as indigenous peoples, minorities, persons with disabilities, women and youth, in their efforts to form associations. (Para. 56)
Right of the child to freedom of association and peaceful assembly: International human rights instruments that protect the rights of particular groups specifically recognize directly or indirectly the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association for those groups: The Convention on the Rights of the Child requires States parties recognizes the rights of the child to freedom of association and to freedom of peaceful assembly. (art. 15) (Para. 20)
Youth participating in demonstrations: In the case of youth, including children, the Special Rapporteur acknowledges that there may be safety concerns when young people participate in some public demonstrations. However, he believes that laws such as that of Malaysia are not tailored narrowly enough to specifically address that concern. Rather, a blanket ban on individuals of a certain age eliminates the right to participate in peaceful public assemblies for an entire portion of the population, without exception, contrary to article 15 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. (Para. 24)
LGBTI rights: “Public morality” laws have been used selectively against those promoting LGBTI rights. In June 2013, the President of the Russian Federation signed legislation banning “propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations” among minors. There is no legal definition in the Russian law of what constitutes non-traditional sexual relations, but it is widely acknowledged to be code for homosexual relations. While legislators have argued that the main purpose of the law is to protect children, the Committee on the Rights of the Child expressed concern at the law and recommended its repeal, as it found that it encouraged the stigmatization and discrimination of LGBTI children and the targeting and persecution of the LGBTI community (CRC/C/RUS/CO/4-5, para. 25). (Para. 30)
Wearing a mask during a demonstration: There may be legitimate and non-criminal reasons for wearing a mask or face covering during a demonstration, including fear of retribution. For example, in Egypt, article 6 of the 2013 law on protests and demonstrations prohibits the wearing of a mask to hide the face during any assembly. That provision contains no exceptions and could be used to discriminate against women who wear the niqab, effectively preventing them from participating in public meetings or protests. Such laws may also be used against individuals with medical disabilities who wear face masks for medical purposes. Certain peaceful protest movements in the Arab world, Western Europe, North America and elsewhere have adopted the use of the Guy Fawkes mask as an emblem. The mask is particularly popular among youth and student protest movements. The donning of this mask can be as much a political statement — a way of identifying with one’s fellow demonstrators and a worldwide movement — as it is an attempt to conceal identity. (Para. 33)
Restrictions to information and communications technologies: In some States, laws of general application may have a disproportionate impact on the assembly rights of certain groups, whether intentionally or inadvertently. For example, laws governing the prevention and combating of offences linked to information and communications technology have the potential to be applied in ways that hinder the organization of peaceful assemblies. Youth, being the largest demographic of social media users, are particularly affected by restrictive Internet access policies. The Special Rapporteur warns that restrictions to information and communications technologies should be applied exceptionally. The general norm should be to permit the open and free use of the Internet and other forms of communications (A/HRC/23/39, para. 76). (Para. 36)
Access to social media: As stated by the Human Rights Council, in its resolution 24/5, the right to freedom of association applies both online and offline. As such, laws that unjustifiably restrict freedom of expression on the Internet and limit the ability of people to associate over that medium are unacceptable. With youth being the most active social media users overall, restrictions placed on access to social media sites will disproportionately affect their ability to organize and mobilize for their common interests. The perception that youth in general lacks maturity and are therefore incapable of participating fully in public affairs often forms the backdrop against which some Governments feel the need to filter and dictate media content made available in their countries. (Para. 63)
Practices to prevent individuals from exercising their rights: Other practices not directly related to the right to freedom of peaceful assembly may also be used as leverage to keep certain groups from freely exercising such right. Those practices include the expulsion of students from universities for participating in peaceful protests (for example, in Chile), the arrest and detention of, and excessive use of force against, peaceful Tibetan students calling for freedom to study the Tibetan language (China), the threat of revocation of residency, refugee or asylum status for participating in peaceful demonstrations, the existence of institutional obstacles that prevent demonstrators from receiving competent legal assistance if charged with an assembly-related crime (including the harassment and intimidation of lawyers who provide such assistance), and the threat of termination of employment (and legal residency status linked to employment in some circumstances) for participating in peaceful protests, for foreigners and migrants. (Para. 47)
Laws limiting the type of associations individuals can join/form: Some laws limit the type of associations that individuals or groups can join or form. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has noted with concern that in Costa Rica, the Children and Adolescents Code denied adolescents the right to form or join political associations, yet they may form community development associations in which they may actively participate (CRC/C/CRI/CO/4, para. 37). In Turkey, children over the age of 15 may form associations and from the age of 12 may join those associations, but they must be 19 in order to form an organizational committee for outdoor meetings (CRC/C/TUR/CO/2-3, para. 38). The justification for explicitly excluding those groups from forming associations that engage in certain activities is unclear. In an example of good practice, the Supreme Court of Estonia found the provisions of the Non-Profit Associations Act that restricted the right to form and lead associations to persons over the age of 18 years old to be in contravention of article 15 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. (Paras. 49-50)
Funding restrictions: Funding restrictions, including restrictions on foreign funding, may disproportionately affect associations that promote issues that do not enjoy popularity or the support of the State or the majority of the population, including those that relate to the advancement of the rights of marginalized groups. This is evidenced by the dichotomy that some States impose regarding association funding sources: certain types of activities or organizations are permitted to receive foreign funding while others only receive domestic funding. For instance, to be considered an Ethiopian charity or society, organizations cannot receive more than 10 per cent of their funding from foreign sources. Only Ethiopian charities or societies may engage in promoting human rights work, gender equality and religious equality, the rights of persons with disabilities, children’s rights, conflict resolution or reconciliation and the efficiency of the justice and law enforcement services. Foreign associations or those that receive more than 10 per cent of their funding from foreign sources may not engage in such activities. (Para. 57)
Criminal prosecution and penal sanctions: Criminal procedure laws and penal sanctions are used in several States to deter the exercise of the right to freedom of association. Authorities who are hostile to critical voices resort to criminal prosecution for defamation or similar offences, thereby discouraging and interfering with legitimate activities by groups. Organizations engaged in human rights work, anti-corruption advocacy and other accountability initiatives are particularly targeted. (...)In El Salvador, article 345 of the Criminal Code considers as illegal two or more people gathering to commit a crime. Despite the necessity to prove intent to commit a crime, law enforcement officials often stop and detain young people simply because it is believed that they are gathering to organize or plan a crime, or that they belong to a gang merely because they have a tattoo, are young, live in a particular neighbourhood where there is gang presence or are poor. Youth are additionally disproportionately affected because criminal groups force them to join their ranks, thereby violating their right to freedom of association. (Para. 60)
Persons with disabilities: The Special Rapporteur recognizes the severe impact that the diagnosis of disability can have on the right to freedom of association. Too often, persons with disabilities are deprived of their autonomy to exercise their voting rights and to choose who to marry, where to live and how to relate to others in the community because of perceived or actual deficiencies in mental capacity and decision-making ability. Persons suffering from cognitive or psychosocial disabilities, and often children and young persons with these disabilities, are most at risk of being deprived of their legal capacity and equal treatment under the law. The Special Rapporteur urges States to take measures to ensure that no one is at any time deprived of their legal capacity due to their disability. Instead, support should be provided to enhance their capacity to exercise the rights and duties that they hold as human beings. (Para. 70)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A/HRC/23/39
Ability of associations to access financial resources as a vital part of the right to freedom of association & Ability to hold peaceful assemblies as an integral component of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly
Report Published: 24 April 2013
Mr Kiai identified the following concerns and issued the following recommendations:
Securing the right to freedom of peaceful assembly: The ability to hold peaceful assemblies is a fundamental and integral component of the multifaceted right to freedom of peaceful assembly, which shall be enjoyed by everyone. Such ability is of utmost importance to the work of civil society actors, including those promoting the realization of economic, social and cultural rights, as it enables them to publicly voice their message, which ultimately benefits the realization of the right(s) they strive to promote and protect, especially in the context of the ongoing dire economic crisis. This is all the more relevant for groups most at risk of violations and discrimination, such as women, youth, indigenous peoples, persons with disabilities, persons belonging to minority groups, groups at risk because of their sexual orientation and gender identity and non-nationals. (Para. 43)
Universal application of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly: Article 21 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights recognizes the right to freedom of peaceful assembly to be enjoyed by everyone, as provided for by article 2 of the Covenant and resolutions 15/21 and 21/16 of the Human Rights Council. Article 15 of the Convention of the Rights of the Child recognizes this right for persons below 18 years of age. Unregistered associations should equally be able to enjoy this right. (Para. 46)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A/HRC/20/27
Best practices that promote and protect the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association
Report Published: 21 May 2012
Mr Kiai identified the following concerns and issued the following recommendations:
Securing the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association: Resolution 15/21 reaffirms that “everyone has the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association” (emphasis added). This provision must be read jointly with article 2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which stipulates that “each State Party undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights recognized in the Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status”(emphasis added), and article 26 thereof, which guarantees to all individuals equal and effective protection against discrimination on grounds identified in article 2. This applies inter alia to minors, indigenous peoples, persons with disabilities, persons belonging to minority groups or other groups at risk, including those victims of discrimination because of their sexual orientation and gender identity (see Council resolution 17/19), non-nationals including stateless persons, refugees or migrants, as well as associations, including unregistered groups. The rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association are key human rights in international human rights law, which are enshrined in article 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (Para. 13)
The Special Rapporteur calls upon States: (b) To ensure that the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association are enjoyed by everyone and any registered or unregistered entities, including women; youth; indigenous peoples, persons with disabilities, persons belonging to minority groups or groups at risk, including those victims of discrimination because of their sexual orientation and gender identity, non-nationals, as well as activists advocating economic, social, and cultural rights; (Para. 84)
Non-discrimination: The Special Rapporteur further considers as best practices training materials developed with a view to preventing discriminatory treatment and measures against women, minors, persons with disabilities, indigenous peoples, individuals and groups of individuals belonging to minorities and other marginalized groups (e.g. Mexico, Serbia, Slovenia and Spain). (Para. 47)
Restriction of the right to freedom of association: International human rights law stipulates that everyone has the rights to freedom of association. As a result, legislation that does not set any specific limitation on individuals, including children (e.g. national human rights institution of Cote d‟Ivoire) and foreign nationals (e.g. Burkina Faso and the United States of America) complies with international standards. However, under international human rights law, members of the armed forces and of the police may have their right lawfully restricted. Any restrictions must, nevertheless, comply with States‟ international human rights obligations as blanket restrictions shall not be considered lawful. The Special Rapporteur further considers as a best practice the Armenian and Estonian legislation that require no more than two persons to establish an association. A higher number may be required to establish a union or a political party, but this number should not be set at a level that would discourage people from engaging in associations. (Para. 54)
Restrictions placed on associations and civil society: Newly adopted laws should not request all previously registered associations to re-register so that existing associations are protected against arbitrary rejection or time gaps in the conduct of their activities. For instance, the Committee on the Rights of the Child, in its concluding observations on Nepal, expressed concerns over the wide-ranging restrictions, such as re-registration requirements, placed by the authorities on civil society organizations (CRC/C/15/Add.260, paras. 33 and 34). (Para. 62)