INDIA: Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women, its Causes and Consequences, in accordance with Commission on Human Rights Resolution 2000/45

Below is a short summary of some of the key issues from the report by the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, in accordance with Commission on Human Rights Resolution 2000/45. This is an addendum to the report from her mission to Bangladesh, Nepal and India on the issue of trafficking of women and girls. Read the full text. Please note that this is not an official UN summary.


At the invitation of the Governments of Bangladesh, Nepal and India, the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences visited Dhaka, Kathmandu, Bhairahwa in Rupandehi district, Delhi, Bombay and Calcutta from 28 October to 15 November 2000 to study the issue of trafficking in women and girls in the region. The present report is intended as a case study to complement the Special Rapporteur's previous report on trafficking in women, women's migration and violence against women, submitted to the Commission on Human Rights at its fifty-fifth session (E/CN.4/2000/68). The Special Rapporteur was reassured that the Governments of Nepal, Bangladesh and India were politically committed to the eradication of trafficking in the South Asian region. She was concerned, however, that some of the national measures being contemplated to combat trafficking were in violation of basic human rights principles. She also impressed upon the Governments of the region the need to bring the proposed SAARC Convention on Trafficking into line with accepted international standards and agreed international language.

Trafficking of girls and women appears to have become a thriving industry in the countries of South Asia. However, hard data are not available with regard to the actual numbers involved in sex work or being trafficked across borders. No survey has been done in any of these countries to ascertain their actual numbers. They are trafficked for a variety of purposes: the primary purpose of trafficking in the region is for forced prostitution, but girls, boys and women are also trafficked for domestic service, organ harvesting, forced begging, forced labour in sweatshops, work as camel jockeys or for forced marriage. Traffickers use deception, fraud, intimidation, drugs and violence to take vulnerable people across borders and are reimbursed for their services. They work alone, in small gangs, or part of an organized crime syndicate. Trafficking of girls and women often follows the same routes as legitimate migration. As one commentator told the Special Rapporteur, "traffickers fish in the stream of migration". This makes trafficking a difficult crime to detect.

Forced prostitution remains the primary goal of traffickers in women and girls into India. The actual number of women in sex work in India is difficult to assess. A survey sponsored by the Central Social Welfare Board of India in 1991 in six metropolitan cities indicated that the population of women and children in sex work is between 70,000 and 1 million. NGO estimates of sex work are, however, much greater. The Indian Association for the Rescue of Fallen Women estimated in 1992 that there are 8 million brothel workers in India and another 7.5 million call girls. The average age of recruitment in the 1990s was between 10 and 14 years old. Half of this population may be infected with HIV/Aids (other commentators estimate the rate of HIV infection at 70 per cent). All commentators agree that there has been a recent growth in trafficking. This has paralleled an increase in undocumented migration within the region. Women and girls are trafficked both within South Asia and from South Asia to other regions. They also agree that in the present context of globalization and migration, fewer victims are being kidnapped or abducted.

The Special Rapporteur's recommendations include international, regional and national measures against trafficking.  She stated that the international community must continue to play a proactive role in preventing trafficking in the South Asian region and that more resources should be given to the Governments of the region to meet this problem of human servitude and forced labour. Furthermore, the countries of the SAARC region should join efforts to collect comprehensive data on trafficking. There should be a central database and a regional survey to assess the nature of the problems, the numbers involved, the profile of the trafficking victim, the profile of the trafficker and the response of national Governments.  She also recommended that a SAARC convention on trafficking be encouraged and that there should be an intergovernmental regional task force on trafficking to plan and implement a concerted strategy for the region. In addition, there should be an interregional police task force to fight trafficking, track traffickers and gather intelligence on trafficking rings. The Governments of the region should also each have a national plan of action to combat trafficking and there should be a monitoring mechanism involving Government, non-governmental organizations and international agencies. Furthermore, Governments should refrain from enacting regulations and orders that restrict the free movement of women under the guise of fighting trafficking. Instead, measures aimed at educating women about their rights and raising awareness about conditions in receiving countries should be compulsory. The respective embassies in receiving countries should be proactive in providing assistance to women and girl victims of trafficking. Protective custody as a means of dealing with victims of trafficking should be reconsidered. The Special Rapporteur also recommended that extensive support be given to NGOs working in this field, and that NGOs working with the children of the sex workers should be given special encouragement along with those who work with the victims of trafficking.



Please note that these reports were submitted to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. They are hosted by Child Rights Connect and CRIN and the author's permission has been obtained for all reports listed. However, unless otherwise stated, they are not the work of either organisation and their inclusion in our database does not necessarily signify endorsement or agreement with their content by Child Rights Connect or CRIN.