SOUTH AFRICA: 'No biblical justification' for hitting child

[8 August 2007] - There can be no biblical justification for corporal punishment of children in the 21st century, a spokesperson for the SA Council of Churches (SACC) in South Africa has said.

Keith Vermeulen, director of the SACC's public policy liaison unit, was speaking at a Cape Town media briefing on the Children's Amendment Bill, which will make it illegal for parents to hit their children.

Parliament is holding public hearings on the bill next week.

"Contrary to belief, there is no occasion ever in the New Testament where Jesus promotes physical punishment as a justifiable means of discipline," Vermeulen said.

He said Christian proponents of hitting children sought to base their arguments on the Old Testament.

However, the Old Testament reflected patriarchy and slavery as the norm, and warfare as a way of solving problems. It was problematic to attempt to transplant that text to a culture three or four thousand years later, Vermeulen said.

Backlash

 

Samantha Waterhouse, advocacy manager of child rights NGO Rapcan, said the Corporal Punishment Working Group was aware that there had been a large backlash against the proposed ban.

Some Christian leaders were claiming that parents had not only a right, but a duty, to beat their children.

"This is frightening in the context of the current levels of violence against children in South Africa, and completely irresponsible," she said.

Waterhouse said children were being spanked, given "good hidings", or beaten with items such as lengths of hosepipe, across the country every day.

If this abuse was inflicted on adults, there would be no question that it was a violation of their rights. Yet, children were even more vulnerable than adults, both physically, psychologically and emotionally.

Hitting children was a violation of their constitutional rights to be free from all forms of violence, and to equal protection under the law.

Waterhouse said the corporal punishment clause would act as a deterrent, like current legislation on cellphone use while driving, and also as a way of changing behaviour.

South Africa already had a very high rate of general violence, Waterhouse said, and teaching children that it was an acceptable solution to conflict would only exacerbate the problem.

Further information

  1. South Africa: Plan to tackle child violence (19 July 2007)
  2. South Africa: Parliament delays child rights bill (14 August 2006)
  3. UN Study on Violence Against Children - news on violence in the home and family
  4. UN Study on Violence Against Children - recommendation number 2
  5. Committee on the Rights of the Child: General Comment 8 - The right of the child to protection from corporal punishment and other cruel or degrading forms of punishment

 

pdf: http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=139&art_id=vn200708...

Country: 

Please note that these reports are hosted by CRIN as a resource for Child Rights campaigners, researchers and other interested parties. Unless otherwise stated, they are not the work of CRIN and their inclusion in our database does not necessarily signify endorsement or agreement with their content by CRIN.