INDIA: Insulting a child is 'corporal punishment'

[NEW DELHI, 13 August 2007] - Making a student kneel down or stand for hours, pinching and slapping are all set to be banned under plans to widen the definition of corporal punishment for schools in India.

Taking a serious view of increasing incidences of violence on children in schools, the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) has expanded the definition of corporal punishment to include even 'small' acts.

NCPCR Chairperson Shantha Sinha has written to all chief education secretaries recommending that there should be no gradations while judging corporal punishment and that "small acts" should not be condoned as they lead to gross violations.

"A slap is as detrimental to the child's right as grievous injury. Indeed there are no gradations since it must be seen that condoning so called 'small acts' actually lead to gross violations," Sinha wrote in the letter.

The Commission has cited rapping on the knuckles, making students kneel down or stand up for long hours, sitting like a chair, pinching and slapping, locking students alone in classrooms and making a child run in the school ground as forms of corporal punishment.

Among the more serious forms of violence against children that the Commission has taken note of are child sexual abuse, torture, and electric shocks.

Sinha said that even acts like slapping and pinching should not be condoned. "Even such small acts should be taken cognisance of because they have an impact on the child's psychology and could lead to more serious forms of punishment," she said.

Teachers: 'measures go to far'

However, schools have opposed the idea, saying while teachers should not be allowed to behave aggressively with children, they should be permitted to use certain means to discipline them and teach the difference between right and wrong.

"Of course, there should be no violence against children. But you cannot disallow the teacher to use any form of punishment against students," said Madhulika Sen of Tagore International School in Delhi.

She said some punishment like standing at the back of the classroom or staying back after school hours should be allowed to make children realise their mistake.

"How do you expect the children to comprehend what is right and what is wrong if they are allowed to get away with everything?" Sen said.

Echoing her views, R P Mallik, chairman of the Federation of Public Schools in the national capital, said a one-sided view of the issue was being taken and the teachers' perspective should be taken into account.

"How will the teacher discipline the children? Parents also use certain means to make children understand where they have gone wrong and the teachers need to do the same," he said.

Mallik said the issue should not be generalised. "If one or two schools have been at fault, you cannot blacklist the entire teaching community and put unnecessary curbs on them," he said.

Further information

pdf: http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/002200708130321.htm

Country: 

Please note that these reports are hosted by CRIN as a resource for Child Rights campaigners, researchers and other interested parties. Unless otherwise stated, they are not the work of CRIN and their inclusion in our database does not necessarily signify endorsement or agreement with their content by CRIN.