ࡱ> q` bjbjqPqP 4::~0 0 0 B >>>8>?tZ@Z@j@L@@HHH$h49QSH"HQSQS @@TuuuQS @@uQSuu|6u@N@ #S>%nDyц$n<2isN2$u2u\QI!Lu#NOHL=I IItdQIQIQIQSQSQSQS%4 4   UN Committee on the Rights of the Child Podgorica, 17 May 2010 Ref: Comments by the NGO Human Rights Action from Podgorica, Montenegro, on the Report of Montenegro submitted to the Committe on the Rights of the Child on 23 November 2008 Dear Chairperson, Ms. Lee, Ladies and Gentlemen, members of the Committee, On behalf of the Human Rights Action, an NGO from Podgorica, Montenegro, I submit several pages of our comments to the report on implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child by the Government of Montenegro. We do hope that our comments will assist the Committee to establish a fruitfull dialogue with the representatives of the Government of Montenegro and suggest concrete steps towards improvement of the enjoyment of human rights by all children on the territory of Montenegro. Sincerely Yours, Tea Gorjanc Prelevic, LL.M. Executive director COMMENTS BY THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACTION (HRA) TO THE STATE REPORT OF MONTENEGRO Introduction (p. 3-5) Comments to the paragraph 4 of the state report regarding relevant Constitutional human rights guarantees in Montenegro General remarks 1. Human rights guarantees in the Constitution of Montenegro are below the level set forth in the Charter on Human and Minority Rights and Civil Freedoms of Serbia and Montenegro (Charter), what is in contravention of the promise given to the Council of Europe that the level of guarantees shall not be impaired. Missing are the following rights and prohibitions: the right of habeas corpus, prohibition of detention due to non-fulfilment of contractual obligations, prohibition of inhuman and degrading punishment, a comprehensive warranty of the right to life, definition of a child, appropriate guarantees of the right to defence and fair trial, guarantees for the apprehended to be brought before the court of law within 48 hours, right to an effective legal remedy due to the infringement of human rights and the right to elimination of consequences of such an infringement. On the other hand, while at variance with the international standard of freedom of expression and provisions of the national Law of Obligations, the Constitution guarantees the right to compensation of damage inflicted by publication of incorrect information. There is also an unjustified restriction on the direct implementation of international human rights standards in Montenegro. Such an implementation shall be indispensable should the Constitutional guarantees of human rights be not improved. 2. The manner of election of the president of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court justices is in contravention of the principle of independence of judiciary, as well as of the need of avoiding a critical impact of politics in the appointment of judges, as promised to the Council of Europe. The appointment of Ombudsman (Protector of human rights and freedoms) by simple parliamentary majority, upon the proposal of the president, who traditionally belongs to the same majority, and without consultation with human rights NGOs or other civil society representatives, also does not ensure the necessary independence and impartiality of the Ombudsman. 3. Composition and appointment of members of the Judicial Council other than members of judiciary, does not ensure independence of that body from the executive and legislative powers nor will it enable its efficient functioning. Article 9 of the Constitution - Legal Order 4. The Constitutional guarantee that ratified international treaties and generally accepted rules of the international law shall have supremacy over domestic legislation, and not with domestic law (as it was laid down by Article 10 of the Constitutional Charter of the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro) may result in practice in conflicting interpretations with respect to the supremacy of international standards in relation to the Constitutional provisions. The term national law should have been used in stead as it is broader, comprises both the Constitution and by-laws and is hence more appropriate for the international obligation of Montenegro to ensure the implementation of international human rights standards regardless of the fact whether they are prescribed by the Constitution or not. 5. The last part of the sentence of Article 9 of the Constitution, stating that international standards shall be directly applicable solely in case of conflict with domestic legislation, leaves room for conflicting interpretations in a situation where national laws do not govern at all some specific issues. Thus, that part of Article 9 should be deleted as it represents an unnecessary presumption to the detriment of the implementation of international standards (see item 17 of the Interim Opinion of the Venice Commission on the Draft Constitution of Montenegro, adopted at its the 71st Plenary Session held on 1-2 June 2007, No. CDL-AD(2007)017, hereinafter referred to as: the V.C. Opinion). The Constitutional Charter of the former State Union of Serbia and Montenegro, article 10, prescribed that international standards should be applied directly, without any restrictions. Comment to paragraphs 8 and 9: 6. We regretfully note that the Government followed the similar method of preparing the state report without an open-call consultation with the interested members of the NGO community, as was the case with preparation of the state report to the Human Rights Council within the Universal Periodic Review Mechanism that did not include cooperation with a single NGO. 7. The report had been made publicly available in Montenegrin language, on the web site of the Ministry of Labour and Social Care on 10 May 2010, following the request submitted by the HRA. Rights of children defined by the Constitution of Montenegro (p. 4-5) Articles 72, Family; 73, Protection of mother and child; 74, Rights of a child A definition of a child is lacking from the Constitution, namely when is the legal age attained, which is particularly relevant in Article 72, where it is only to be supposed that paragraph 2 refers to underage children, and paragraph 3 to adults, i.e. the children of age. Article 47, Freedom of expression, provides that the right to freedom of expression may be limited only by the right of others to dignity, reputation and honour and if it threatens public morality or security of Montenegro, but does not provide for legitimate limitation due to respect of ones privacy, including the one of a child. Furthermore, the Criminal Code of Montenegro, in its art. 147, Disclosing and dissemination of personal circumstances, also does not provide for sufficient protection of privacy, as it allows for the defence of media, for example, by the proof of truth and prohibits only disclosure of private facts that may hurt ones honour and reputation, but not those that may hurt ones privacy. Media Act states that the media should protect the integrity of minors and should not reveal the identity of minors involved in criminal acts either as victims or as accused (art. 22). The minority rights guarantees from Art. 79 of the Constitution, stated in paragraph 18 of the State report in practice are not implemented with regard to Roma, who have not been explicitly noted by the Constitution as people and national minorities living in Montenegro, although they make at least 2% of the overall population. Comment to the paragraph 22 (Strategies and Plans) The Strategy for permanent solution of the situation of refugees and internally displaced persons (2005-2008) did not provide for such solutions in practice. The new registration of refugees and IDPs (with the dissolution of Serbia and Montenegro all IDPs eventually became refugees) was performed in November 2009. Refugees have major problems with regulating their status and acquiring citizenship, especially as the costs of the procedure have been set in vast disproportion with the average income of members of such population. Comment to the paragraph 29 Continuous professional training of the holders of judicial functions in Montenegro has still not been made obligatory. The Act on Education of Holders of Judicial Office states in that holders of judicial office have the right and obligation to a professional training (Article 4). However, the number of paid working days every judge should spend at training per year has not been defined, nor are judges or prosecutors held disciplinary responsible if they do not appear at the trainings. The only incentive provided is the fact that participation at training seminars is considered advantage for promotion, but the whole system as such is not based on parameters for assessment of such criteria, so such incentive for the training may well be assessed as unimportant and insufficient. A separate issue is the fact that judges in Montenegro do not specialize in particular sphere of law. For example, one may be a civil law judge, but then get promoted to a position of the criminal law judge of the High court. HRA advocates for specialization of judges aided by regular obligatory professional training. Comment to the paragraph 31 According to media reports, the Council for the Rights of the Child was established on 16 November 2009 and the Councils only publicly announced action so far included celebration of the anniversary of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The composition of the Council that includes six ministers will not necessarily ensure its effective operation. Comments to paragraphs 32-34 The manner of appointment of the Montenegro Ombudsperson does not guarantee the independence and impartiality of the institution. According to the Constitution, the Protector of Human Rights and Freedoms is appointed by the simple majority vote in the Parliament on the basis of the proposal of the president of Montenegro, who belongs, as has traditionally been the case, to the ruling political party that has held majority in the Montenegrin parliament for very many years. The first Ombudsperson in Montenegro was in position from 2003 to 2009, Mr. Sevko Crnovrsanin, a former judge of the Constitutional Court (Constitutional Court judges are being appointed in the same manner as the Ombudsman) who was generally perceived rather as a state servant than an uncompromising human rights defender. In October 2009, the authorities forgot to initiate, in due time, the mechanism for the appointment of the new Ombudsperson. Moreover, the Act on the Protector of Human Rights and Freedoms was not put in accordance with the Constitution to date and hence the second Ombudsperson was appointed in 2009 directly on the basis of the Constitution and not the law that provided for a different procedure. As the law provided that the proposal of Ombudsman would be made by a Parliamentary committee, following the consultation with NGOs dealing with human rights, ten human rights NGOs asked the president to consult them before deciding on the new Ombudsman, but he declined to do so. The current Ombudsman is Mr. Sucko Bakovic, formerly Deputy Supreme State Prosecutor of Montenegro. Until March 2010 the state prosecutors used to act as representatives of the government in civil disputes. Their independence and impartiality with regard to the judicial and especially executive branch of government is still under significant doubt, both because of lack of experience of the independence and impartiality of the state prosecutors due to decades of the communist one party rule, and many cases of human rights violations that still remain not effectively investigated in Montenegro. Comment to the paragraph 52 Although also the Family Act prohibits marriage of a minor below 18, or 16 years of age (with parental consent) it is not known whether the government is undertaking any measures to prevent child marriages within Roma community, which are a frequent cause of elementary school Roma children drop-out. Comment to the paragraph 55 The state is still not undertaking sufficient efforts to ensure that all children are entered into the Birth registry, especially among the children of Roma, who are still being born outside the hospitals and who do not report their children to the authorities.  Comment to the paragraph 57 In 2007 one child committed suicide in Montenegro, according to the Montenegro Office of Statistics. In 2008 four children committed suicide and several other children attepted to commit suicide, according to the Police reports. The one case was especially striking as it involved a girl who explained in a farewell letter that she could not have coped otherwise with a conflict she had with her class teacher. HRA also finds it concerning that the Ministry of Education is not keeping record of the cases of violence occuring in the Montenegrin schools. The schools do not have the obligation to report such instances to the Minsitry and there is hence no official record or analysis of the school violence apart from the police records, and not all instances of violence are being reported to the police. III. General principles 1. The right to life, survival and development (art. 6, para. 1) Explicit guarantees of the right to life are lacking from the Constitution The prohibition of the death penalty and cloning referred to in Article 26 and Article 27, item 2, is all that remained in the Constitution from the guarantees to life. Actually, in Article 28, par. 2, the inviolability of physical integrity has been guaranteed, but the right to life specifically described and guaranteed by both the ECHR (Article 2) and the ICCPR (Article 6) is of a much broader meaning. The Venice Commission has recommended (V.C. Opinion, item 23), that the guarantees of the right to life be governed in accordance with the provision of Article 2 of the ECHR. HRA advocated that the Constitution should, on the basis of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, make even a step forward and expressly lay down the obligation of the state to undertake all reasonable measures for the purpose of protection of human life, as well as to engage in effective investigation of causes of death reasonably suspected of not being naturally caused. The reason of such of our advocacy is that we are of the opinion that the obligation of state to engage efficiently in the investigation of murders has not yet been adequately rooted in the practice of Montenegro nor it has been prescribed as an obligation of state bodies by virtue of the procedural aspect of protection of the right to life pursuant to Article 2 of the ECHR and Article 6 of the ICCPR, as well as the practice of the European Court of Human Rights and the Human Rights Committee. In Article 38, paragraph 3 of the Constitution, the provision on the prohibition of torture should be supplemented by adding the words or punishment, pursuant to Article 3 of the ECHR and Article 7 of the ICCPR. The case of ineffective investigation of suspicious deaths of two Roma children Competent state authorities have still not effectively investigated two unreported deaths of Roma children within one family in Niksic in 2008 and 2009. Although the Police department and Ambulance have not been informed by the family about the death of the first one-year-old boy in October 2008, it was the researcher of human rights violations A. Zekovic who eventually did inform the authorities. He also reported the case to the Supreme State Prosecutor in January 2009, only to receive a response on 16 July 2009 that the information was forwarded to the High State Prosecutor's Office in Podgorica. Furthermore, Zekovic believes that the ineffective response of the authorities could have contributed to the new tragic event in the same family - the death of a nine-month old baby on 7 July 2009. The report of the Centre for Social Welfare stated that the two dead children were given to their uncle and aunts custody, who at the time already had nine of their own children. The report also stated that the children were taking care of themselves, and that, according to a Roma rights activist, they were starved, neglected and abused. To date there has not been any feedback from the State Prosecutors Office regarding investigation of the case. V. Family environment and alternative care The Kozica children case The case of four neglected children from the Kozica family provides an example of incapacity of the competent Montenegrin authorities to provide for the effective protection of rights of the neglected children. In this case, the childrens solely parent was an alchocholic, of foreign (Serbian) nationality, as were the children, who did not enroll them into school, nor had provided them with basic care. The case summarized bellow points to the sad fact that from the moment of notification of the authorities more than a year passed before effective measures were implemented to insure that the children received neccessary hygienic and other care, due to the pressure of the interested NGO activists. The case also highlights the fact that apart from one institution in Bijela for children without parental care, Montenegro does not have a proper shelter for neglected children, who have living parents, but who for whatever reasons do not provide them with necessary care. Aleksandar Zekovic, a researcher of violations of human rights in Montenegro informed the Centre for Social Work in Podgorica on 29 November 2008 about the case of a six-year-old boy M.K., who was clearly neglected and had skin changes on his face and body. Zekovic said that the boy spends his days on the street, begging and collecting food and other items from the garbage container. In the information he received from the Center it was stated that the Center acts on the request of the Police Department, and that Zekovic should report the case to the Police and not the Centre, and he did do so. The Center for Social Work acted on the same day of the Police report, and the Centers representative was present while the officers of the Police Department in Podgorica were collecting information from the the boy and his father. The Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare informed Zekovic on 6 March 2009, that, during their visit, they registered four children, born in 1994, 1996, 1997 and 2001, whose father was Kozica Sead and whose mother passed away. Children did not go to school, lived in poor conditions and did not have adequate conditions for development. The Ministry further stated that it is crucial to relocate children from the family as soon as possible, because of inadequate conditions. Furthermore, the Center for Social Wefare informed Zekovic on 13 March 2009 that the Multidisciplinary Operating Team (MOT) for protection of children from neglect and abuse has taken measures to solve the problem. The Center further stated that although the social welfare centers have the mandate to provide help, support and emergency protective measures especially to children, they cannot, apart from other institutions of the system, independently solve these problems. Zekovic submitted new request in order to find out what has the Centre for social work done regarding this case from 12 March 2009 till 9 December 2009, when this request for information was sent. The Centre for Social Welfare responded that the MOT has been changed in the meantime (due to financial reasons, because team members were not receiving salary). They further noted that the newly formed MOT had the same findings regarding the living conditions of the four Kozica children, and will intensify activities in order to solve this problem. Zekovic finally submitted the case to the Basic State Prosecutor for review of illegality of performance of the competent state bodies on 12 January 2010. There was no information to date on the decision of the State prosecutor. On Monday 18 January 2010 there was a session of the MOT where NGO activists requested urgent measures from the competence of the Centre for Social Work, such as initiation of the proceedings for partial deprivation of parental rights of the father and urgent residental care for children before their final deportation to their homeland, Serbia, where they have cousins and, according to the information received from the Centre for social work in Serbia, better conditions for life and schooling. On 22 January 2010, the Kozica children were finally removed from their father and temporarily sheltered in the Centre for Children and Youth Ljubovic, the institution housing under age delinquents. The Centre has a room for temporary residence of foreign children before their deportation to the country of origin (usually the neighboring countries, Serbia or Kosovo). The father was allowed to visit the children and he did do so frequently under the influence of alchochol. Finally, in February 2010, the children were sent to Serbia, Prijepolje, together with their father, and were greeted there by their grandparents and the social worker of the Social Care Centre in Prijepolje. The Serbian Ombudsman for the Rights of the Child was also involved to supervise the well being of children. Hence, fifteen months have passed from the first notification of the authorities of the case to its final solution. According to our assessment, following this case, the Ministry should have ordered a thorough review of performance of MOTs and reached some conclusions and drafted guidelines for their future performance. It appears that although a MOT may well initiate the case, it rarely effectivelly observes how the case develops. VI. Basic health care and social care 2. Children with disabilities (art. 23) Comments to the paragraph 247 The case of Komanski most institution for mentally handicapped children and adults The European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) at the end of its visit to Montenegro, on 22 September 2008, almost two years ago, informed the authorities of Montenegro that the conditions in which the residents of the Komanski most Institute are forced to live can be described as inhumane and degrading ("Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5 of the Conventions", paragraph 6 and paragraph 130 of the report). The Committee found that at the time of their visit the living conditions in the Komanski most Institute were appalling, that the level of hygiene in the Institute was not at the level of a care facility and requested urgent measures to be taken in order to adjust the condition to minimal standards. It was emphasized that the "appropriate management control is necessary to prevent physical abuse of residents," as maltreatment had also been determined by the Committee (please read the paragraph 111 of the CPT Report on Montenegro). Although the CPT also requested in September 2008 that the minors should urgently be transferred to another institution, it did not happen to date. The first information about negative practice in this institution was announced already in 2001, when the NGO "Shelter for Women and Children Victims of Violence" received a photograph showing sexual abuse of a minor by an adult. That was followed by the NGOs reaction in the form of letter to the police and other competent authorities, but an adequate response was never received. The director of this institution, Mr. Vuk Mirkovic, who is still occupying the same post, commented at the time that such behavior "is not unusual" (!) The adult man from the photograph was also a resident of the institution and according to expert reports, a pedophile with an uncontrolled libido. The boy from the photograph disappeared three years after, aged thirteen, and his whereabouts were never determined. The media reported on the publicly stated concern of the Department for refugees and IDPs, also in charge of the boy, that he must have been kidnapped, as he was not capable of leaving the institution on his own. Although the institution also recorded another disappearance of its resident, a girl, who was also never found, no employee of the institution had ever been prosecuted or punished in any way for these events. Following the publication of the CPT report by the government in April 2010, three NGOs (HRA, Shelter for Women and Children Victims of Violence and Center for Anti-Discrimination EKVISTA) requested resignation and criminal prosecution of the director of the institution, due to the findings of the CPT and of the Swiss NGO, Gemeinden Gemeinsam Schweiz (GGS), that also publicly supported the findings of the CPT especially regarding long term physical maltreatment of the residents of the institution. To date, the director of the institution has not been suspended, nor was any kind of a punitive proceeding been initiated against him. Although such impunity for human rights violations is not uncommon for Montenegro, it appears especially horrific and arrogant in the case involving especially vulnerable children and other people with special needs. Therefore, the three NGOs decided to diligently demand from the Supreme State Prosecutor an effective and uncompromising investigation of the responsibility of all those responsible for the management of the institution as well as for its supervision. VII. Education, leisure and cultural activities (paragraphs 282, 284, 290) and VIII. Refugee Children and Children Members of Minority Groups (paragraphs 390, 391, 392, 400-406) The right to the primary education in Montenegro is defined by the Constitution and the Law on Primary education it is mandatory for all children from the age of 6 to 15, and parents or tutors must ensure for their children to meet the compulsion of primary education. However, according to the Montenegrin Agency for Statistics (MONSTAT) data there are 2587 children of Roma nationality of age 6 to 15 currently residing in Montenegro, while only 1224 of them or 47.7 percent are included in the school system. The difficulty regarding this issue is not only enrolling Roma children in school, but keeping them in school until the end of a nine year elementary sschooling program. The data of the Ministry of Education show that only 10 percent of Roma children complete educational cycle that they entered. The Ministry of Education and Science, together with the Open Society Fund and the UNICEF, initiated the project Roma Educational Initiative (REI) in 2003. Its main goal was the creation of a good and sustainable model of Roma children education. Particular quality of the REI project was the introduction of Roma assistants, which worked together with Roma children and their families and provided considerable help in overcoming language and cultural barriers. The project was completed in 2008, but the Government of Montenegro unfortunately did not provide for further financing for Roma teaching assistants, who were one of the key factors in keeping children of Roma population in school. According to the responses received from the Ministry of Education and Science, only one parent of Roma origin was ever fined for violating Article 81 of the Law on Primary Education, i.e. for not enrolling a child to school or not securing the childs regular school attendance. The Ministry of Education and Science also stated that it never conducted inspection visits to refugee settlements, housing mostly Roma population, in order to check whether there were children living there that were not enrolled in school. The Ministry also informed that although it is taking great efforts to ensure the education for all children, and therefore the children of Roma nationality, it would still be essential to improve the mechanism for identifying children who are not included in the educational process. HRA believes that the state is not undertaking sufficient effort in this regard, especially as it failed to provide for Roma teaching assistants in elementary schools and as it still did not ensure for a mechanism for identification of children, especially of Roma or refugee origin, who were not timely enrolled in elementary schools. Cetinje High School Protest Under the current Law on General Education, Art. 73 School Board or Administrative Board of educational institutions consisits of two representatives of the Ministry of Education and Science, two representatives of the Institute of Education, two employees representatives and one parents representative. According to Art. 80 of the same law, the election of directors must be approved by the Minister of Education and Science, regardless of the decision of the Board. We believe that this legal solution allows discrimination on the basis of political affiliation, which, in the case of Montenegrin Cetinje Gymnasium (High School), sparked a revolt of pupils and their parents and significantly affected the enforcement of the right to education during this school year. The School Board of Cetinje Gymnasium met on 1 July 2009 and voted M. Djurisic the director of the Gymnasium, by proportion of votes 4:3. Minister of Education and Science refused to approve this decision. Two weeks later, the Institute of Education delivered the decision to the School Board for dismissal of the member of the School Board M. K., and the same day an objection to the decision of Djurisics election for director was submitted by O. Grbovic, member of local committee of the ruling SPD and Djurisics rival. Afterwards, on 24 August, two more members of the School Board submitted irrevocable resignation, while one member informed the Board verbally of being unable to participate in further work of the Board. As the school year in Montenegro begins on 1 September, about 70% of Gymnasium students, dissatisfied with this decision of the Ministry of Education and Science and supported by parents and part of the professors, refused to attend classes, demanding from the Ministry to approve the original decision of the School Board. The new School Board, whose president was the president of the ruling political partys DPS Club of the members in local parliament was elected on 9 September and decided to adopt an objection of the candidate Grbovic and announce election for the school principal once more. The pupils did not agree with the structure of the new School Board and continued to protest. (Mayor of the Municipality of Cetinje M. Jankovic, regarding the election of Djurisic, stated that the Deputy Minister of Education and Science told him in a telephone conversation that Djurisic is inapt to be the director of the Gymnasium because of his alleged meetings with the Archbishop of the Serbian Orthodox Church-Amfilohije.) The Prime Minister Djukanovic took part in solving the problem on 9 October 2009, when he held a meeting with students and parents representatives. In that meeting Djukanovic proposed forming of the new School Board, whose members would be prominent citizens of Cetinje. Satisfied with the outcome of this meeting, the students ended their protest and after forty-two days went back to school. Djurisic ran for school director and was elected the director of Gymnasium by unanimous decision of the School Board. The Minister approved the decision of the Board and shortly thereafter resigned. In our opinion, the Deputy Ombudsman for Rights of the Child did not contribute much in solving this problem, except for submitting the initiative to amend the General Law of Education to Parliament, in which she required for high school students to be allowed to participate in the work of school administration. The same amendments were proposed by the Union of Education and Science and political party Movement for Change, but have not been accepted to date. With the purpose of suppressing and preventing discrimination on the basis of political affiliation and choosing teaching and management staff based on expertise, talent and commitment, HRA believes that it is necessary to amend the current Law on general Education in order to increase the participation of students and parents in the work of school boards which, among other things, participate in the election of directors. In addition, the Minister of Education should not have the right, without valid explanation, to disapprove of the decision of the school board.  For more detail, please see International Human Rights Standards and Constitutional Guarantees in Montenegro, Human Rights Action, Podgorica, 2008, available at:  HYPERLINK "http://www.hraction.org/wp-" http://www.hraction.org/wp- content/uploads/knjiga-eng.pdf. The publication also contains the text of the Constitution in English language, as well as the Opinion on the Constitution by the Venice Commission.  The ratified and published international agreements and generally accepted rules of international law shall make an integral part of the internal legal order, shall have the supremacy over the national legislation and shall be directly applicable when they regulate the relations differently from the internal legislation. (Art. 9)  Parents shall be obliged to take care of their children, to bring them up and educate them (Art. 72, para. 2)  Children shall take care of their parents in need of assistance (Art. 72, para. 3)  The Preamble of the Constitution notes Montenegrins, Serbs, Bosniacs, Albanians, Muslims, Croats and the others  More detailed information on the status of refugees in Montenegro may be provided by the UNHCR.  For more details please see the publication Assessment of the Reform of Appointment of Judges in Montenegro, Human Rights Action, 2008, available at:  HYPERLINK "http://www.hraction.org/wp-content/uploads/hra-analiza_reforme_izbora_sudija_u_crnoj_gori-eng.pdf" http://www.hraction.org/wp-content/uploads/hra-analiza_reforme_izbora_sudija_u_crnoj_gori-eng.pdf  Obiljezavanje dvije decencije Konvencije (Marking two decades of the Convention), Pobjeda, 17 November 2010; Trajna zastita obaveza drzave (Continuous protection is the states obligation), Dan, 17 November 2010.  NGO Protest concerning oversight of Competent State Bodies to Appoint Ombudsman in a Timely Manner,  HYPERLINK "http://www.hraction.org/wp-content/uploads/hra-analiza_reforme_izbora_sudija_u_crnoj_gori-eng.pdf" http://www.hraction.org/wp-content/uploads/hra-analiza_reforme_izbora_sudija_u_crnoj_gori-eng.pdf.  Please consider Information presented by the HRA on the meeting with the EU Rule of Law mission representatives:  HYPERLINK "http://www.hraction.org/?p=333" http://www.hraction.org/?p=333.  According to reports of the NGO Legal Centre, I roditelji vrse nasilja nad djecom (Parents are also exerting Violence over their Children), Dan, 6 June 2009.  Bijeg od neizdrzivog (Flight from the Unbearable), Vijesti, 19 December 2008.  Ivezaj: bila je dijete za primjer (She Was a Distinguished Child), Vijesti, 5 June 2008  Letter from the Ministry of Education and Science, 5 January 2010, No. 01-7466/2, is available in the HRA archive.  Autopsy is hiding a mystery of death, Daily Dan, 5 August 2009  More details on the case, including written communication with the authorities are available with Mr. Aleksandar Sasa Zekovic, asz@t-com.me.  Data is available in the archive of Aleksandar Zekovic,researcher of violation of human rights in Montenegro  ,,The father has a house and earning, Vijesti, 3 December 2008.  Data is available in the archive of Aleksandar Zekovic, researcher of violation of human rights in Montenegro.  Ibid.  Ibid.  Ibid.  Ibid.  Tea Gorjanc Prelevic, executive director of HRA suggested provision of such measures and closely observed the case development.  In the third section the CPT report, which deals with the living conditions of the residents of this institution the following was stated: At the time of the visit, residents living conditions were appalling. Ward B was acommodating 67 residents distributed into 12 dormitories. In the totally bare and malodorous rooms, residents (some of whom were physically handicapped or blind as well as mentally disabled) were seen to lie alone, occasionally with their heads covered with a blanket, some naked, with flies crawling on them. In a locked baby room, the delegation saw 5 bedridden residents, aged between 3 and 19, lying in cots. There is also a locked dayroom where about 25 residents (men, women and children together) were left wandering alone. Further, in an unstaffed and locked part of the ward where residents appeared to be left alone, the delegation found a dayroom in which 7 residents were fixated to furniture (see paragraph 127)... It is further stated.. the level of hygiene, particularly on Ward B, holding the more vulnerable and challenging residents, did not befit a care institution. In some of the dormitories there was urine and faeces on the floor. Walls and bedding. Furthermore, the establishment was infested with mice..  The daily Dan, 5 November 2001   Nestali dje ak ~rtva pedofila (Missing Boy a Pedophile Victim)  , Dan, 19 Avgust 2004.   Zavod priznao dje akovu otmicu (The Institution Admitted the Kidnapping)  , Dan, 18 August 2004.  Text of the press release is available at: http://www.hraction.org/?p=349.  GGS sent a letter to the Minister of Labor and Social Care explaining their negative experience with the director of the institution who several years ago rejected their financial and other support. The letter was published by the daily newspaper Vijesti, Mirkovic nije bio zainteresovan (Mirkovic was not interested) on 11 April 2010. Source: MONSTAT (Montenegrin Agency for Statistics) "Database for RAE (Roma, Ashkali, Egyptian) population in Montenegro, May 2009.  Data available on the website http://www.osim.org.me/fosi_rom_en/frame_about_us.htm  Many Roma children who are refugees from Kosovo speak only Albanian and need additional language tuition in order to be able to follow the regular curriculum in Montenegrin language.  Response of the Ministry of Education and Science of 7 May 2009, available in the HRA archive.  Response of the Ministry of Education and Science of 27 July 2009, available in the HRA archive. The board fears until force replaced, Dan, 24. August 2009.  Jankovic asked apologize from Ministry, Vijesti, 19 September 2009.  School board members, submitted resignations, Dan, 25 August 2009.  DPS decided, students indignationed, Dan, 10 September 2009.  Jankovic asked apologize from Ministry, Vijesti, 19 September 2009.  At Prime Ministers Word, Monitor, 16 October 2009.  Djurisic is officially Director, Vijesti, 12 December 2009.  Students in the school boards, Dan, 11 November 2009.  School boards to elect directors, Vijesti 5 May 2010.    h i    5 ? | } ~  ƾvjvjv]NChx56mHsHhxhxCJaJmHsHjhxhx0JUhCJaJmHsHhxCJaJmHsHh-uhx5mHsHhxmHsHhf"mHsHhzmHsHh=mHsHhxGmHsHhexmHsHh_;emHsHhU[|mHsHh}h3mHnHsH uh3CJmHnHsH u+jh3B* CJUmHnHph sH u0123abcd     1 2 b c d $<^` N 'xyEQ_k F)DEFQ˿˰۞凞h>*CJaJh-u>*CJaJhxhx6H*h-umHsHjhhx0J>*Uhh>*mH sH hhx>*hxhx5hxhx6hxhxmHsH hxhxhxhx567QZ[]cefikw%GM* ɾɾѾپپѳxof^W h-uh-uhh-u>*h-u5mH sH hb5CJaJh-uh-u5CJaJh-u5CJaJh=h-u>*CJaJh=h-uCJaJh=h-uCJaJmHsHh=h-umHsHh-uh-umHsHhmHsHh-umHsHh=mHsHh-u>*CJaJh>*CJaJh-uh-u>*CJaJ*+? @ !##%%R%S%i'j'$$a$gdQ" ]^gdb ]^gd-u $n^na$gd-u^gd-u !]^gd=$a$gd-u$a$gd  = > @ !!#######L$%%%%Q%R%W%g'h'i'j''''1(źyky`TKhb>*CJaJhbhb>*CJaJh-uhQ"CJaJjh!g0JCJUaJhQ"hQ"CJaJhCJaJhQ">*CJaJhQ"hQ">*CJaJ!jhbhb0JCJUaJhbCJaJhbhbCJaJh-uCJaJh-uhCJaJh-uh-uCJaJh-umHsH h-uh-ujh-uh-u0JUj'''++++d-e---5555667788 ]^gdC($a$gd ]^gd-\$a$gdb$sn]s^na$gdb $s]sa$gdb ]^gdb1(;(((**+++++ ,V,i,v,|,,,,,c-d-e-g----.......//üwnbZZZZh-\CJaJhh>*CJaJhb>*CJaJhbhb>*CJaJh>*CJaJh-uh-umHsHhbmHsHjhahb0JUhmH sH hhb hahbhhb>*mH sH  h>*hbCJaJ!jhbhb0JCJUaJhbhbCJaJhCJaJ#/$/J/^///// 00?0C001122L3M3A4S4T444B5h5s5~55555555555666777˿˿o!hhB*aJmH$phsH$$hh>*B*aJmH$phsH$hr` >*B*aJmH$phsH$hC(mH sH h-\h-\CJaJhZX >*CJaJh-\h-\>*CJaJhr` >*CJaJ!jhbhb0JCJUaJhr` CJaJhbhbCJaJh-\CJaJ+7888888485899999c:d:`;a;b;z;};¶}uguUI>:he|he|he|CJaJhC(B*mH$phsH$#hh l5OJQJ^JmHsHjh l0JUmHsHh lmHsHhC(mHsH!jhhC(0JUmHsHhhC(mHsHhr` >*mHsHhhC(>*mHsHhB*mH$phsH$hC(hC(CJaJ!jhC(hC(0JCJUaJhC(hC(0J5CJaJ%hC(hB*CJaJmH$phsH$8586899a;b;z;;;< <AABBBBSETEqG$a$gdC-$a$gdb ]^gdb ]^gd-\$a$gdZX !^`gdC($a$gd$a$gdC(};;;;;;;;<<< <\<x<G>P>S>^>>?AAAAAAAARB_BBBBBBBBBBBĸĭĥĞtiehC-h-uh-umHsHhZX h-u>*CJaJhe|>*CJaJhC->*CJaJhZX hZX >*CJaJ hFhZX h 7$hZX 5hZX hZX mHsHh 7$hZX 6hZX h 7$hZX hZX mHsHhZX hZX >*hZX hZX >*mHsHh=>*mHsHhC(>*mHsH hThZX 'B[CzCCCC(D)DDDDDDEEREwEzE{EEEEEEEF FFF&FGFSFWF[FiFmFwF}FFFFFFFFFFG.G0G6G=GGGXGYGZGpGGGGGGGGGGHHžhe|>*mHsHh9< hTh9<h9<mHsHhxmHsH hSohC-jhC-0JU hAhC-hC-mH sH hC- hhC-CqGrGGGGHH+H,HKK[N\NFOGO&Q'QSS1U2UVVXXYY$a$gd9<&gd9<$a$gdb$a$gdC-H*H,HKKLTLXLYLpL}LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLM%M)M*M=MAMMMPMeMMMMMMƱƟƱƱxxƱƱƱƱxƱƱƱxƱ)h/ih9<0J'B*CJaJmHphsH#h9<0J'B*CJaJmHphsH#h9<0J'B*CJaJmH phsH )h/ih9<0J'B*CJaJmH phsH !h/ih9<0J'B*CJaJphh/ih9<mHsHh9<mHsHh9<>*mHsHh/ih9<>*mHsH(MMMMNNN+NENGNWNXNYNZN[N\NȪ檏x]LE:2h9<mHsHh/ih9<mHsH h/ih9<!jh/ih9<0JUmHsH4h9<0J'B*CJaJfHmH phq sH ,h9<0J'B*CJaJfHphq 4h9<0J'B*CJaJfHmHphq sH:h/ih9<0J'B*CJaJfHmHphq sH:h/ih9<0J'B*CJaJfHmH phq sH 2h/ih9<0J'B*CJaJfHphq \N]NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOO O OOO#O-OCODOEOFOKObOpOzOOOOOP PAPIPiPPPPPPPP¶该hqh9<mHsHh9<mHsHhh9<B*mHphsHjh9<0JU h|h9<h9<B*mHphsHhqh9<B*mHphsHh9<B*phh <h9<B*mH phsH hqh9<B*phh9<B*mH phsH 3PQQ#Q$QQQbQ}QQQQQQQQ RRR_RlRRRRSSSS%S&S1S@SDSSS|SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTT+TTTYTcTfTqTwTTTTTTT-U.U/U\UsUUU X X\h\h9<mHsHhh9<mHsHh9 h9<mHsHjh9<0JUmHsHhqh9<mHsHh9<mHsHIY[[\\\ ] ]4]5]S]T]U]]]__DbEbgg iekfk$dd@&[$\$a$gd`$a$gd`$a$gdb&gd`$a$gd9<\\ ] ]]]3]4]T]U]]]D^N^^_q____巤gTg:g3jh`h`0JB*UfHphq $h`h`0J'5B*CJaJph2h`h`0J'B*CJaJfHphq !h`h`0J'B*CJaJph#h`0J'B*CJaJmH phsH $h`h`0J'>*B*CJaJph&he|0J'>*B*CJaJmH phsH h9<5mH sH he|5mH sH h`h`5h`5mH sH  hTh`h>bh9<mHsH__`g`CbDbEbFbrbbbbbbbbccDcJc{cccccd)d5d9dGd\d]d^ddd;f*CJOJQJ^JaJmHsH(h_05CJOJQJ\^JaJmHsHhzmHsHjh1hM0JUjh0JU\jh1hM0JU\h1hM\hM\mH sH hmH sH h h1hMhMmH sH h1hMmHsH!jh1hM0JUmHsHvvvvwwwwwwyyy$y%y7yey{yyyyr{s{{{{{||}}}}}}}~!~"~%~/~R~Z~m~~~~~~~~ ϷϷϷϫ"jhZh9<0JB*UphhZh9<B*phh9<B*phh9<B*mH phsH jhDVh9<0JUhDVh9<mHsH hDVh9<+hZh9<5CJOJQJ^JaJmHsH%h9<5CJOJQJ^JaJmHsH4 =>]~.9<LMWaƀӀۀ*IJeiÁ́с=Bj"*5>fiăǃ߃h9< hZh9<"jhZh9<0JB*Uphh9<B*mH phsH hZh9<B*phh9<B*phM=>\L |c`gd`gd-u`gdxN`Ngdx$a$gd=$a$gdM $Aa$gd9<$a$gd9<9hijmʄքل!"%+IQrstÅdfpq҆LJȇɇ۾۶jhxhxUjhxhxU hxhxjhxhx0JUh9<mHsHhs h9<B*phhDVh9<B*ph hZh9<hZh9<B*phh9<B*ph"jhZh9<0JB*Uph4ɇcd/0+,8ƿyumufu[mRmNfyhbh0hmJ0JjhmJU hmJhmJjhmJUhmJjhmJhb0JUh!g hh!gjhh!g0JU hhbjhhb0JUjhh-u0JU hh-u h-uhxjh-uhx0JU hRhxhx hxhxjhxhxUhxhx0J/c΍ߍڐې78gd9<gdC-$a$gd lgdr` gdmJ`gdb.SލߍHIU !Ï;quxͲơͲƅyy⅁hhC(6hC(jhC(0JUj'hr` U hr` hbjhr` hb0JUhbh0hr` 0Jjhr` U hr` hr` jhr` UjhmJhb0JUhr` hmJhbmHsHhmJhb6 hmJhb,ڐېܐ789ˑԑu"456ĽĵĮ~s~g~\hBh9<mHsHhKh9<6mHsHhKh9<mHsHh9<mHsHhEh9<mHsHh\h9<mHsHh9<jh9<0JUhe| h hC-hC-mHsH hAhC-hC-jhC-0JUh ljh l0JU hC(6jhC(0JUhr` hC(hhC(6$5ƓI֔5XYz _`;UgdM dd@&[$\$gde|$a$gd`gd`$ddC$[$\$a$gd`$dd[$\$a$gd`gd9<67noœƓǓHIJՔ֔$56WXYͼwjc_ch` h 2~h`jh 2~h`0JUh 2~h`CJ]aJh 2~h`6CJ]aJh 2~h`CJaJmHsH!HhVfh 2~h`CJaJh 2~h`CJaJ!jh 2~h`0JCJUaJ h6Ah9<jh9<0JUh/ Oh9<mHsHh9<mHsHh\h9<mHsHh9<$YZ<@|~FHNVdz| ќ .I^_`௤|uquqiqiquahMmHsHh2h`6h` h 2~h`jh 2~h`0JUhe|he|CJaJmH sH he|CJaJmH sH he|he|CJaJ!jhe|he|0JCJUaJhZh`6mHsHh2h`6mHsHh`mHsHhZh`mHsH hZh`jhZh`0JU$`ah{ߝ;< *0SUVW_k#*>Ԟ{tlt{tlthDVh9<6 hDVh9<jhDVh9<0JUhMhhMmHsH hhMjhhM0JU hNkhMhjh0JU h/hMjh/hM0JUhNkhMmHsHhnhMmHsHhMmHsHjhNkhM0JU&U?ǠG:;=>@ACDFGPQRSTh]hgdw &`#$gddgd9<gdM>?@qtƠǠȠ#'*-4GHls¡#&9:;<>?ABDEGHNOPQRόhdhw hw0Jjhw0JUjhA@UhA@ hh9<Uh`mHsHhih9<mHsHhDVh9<6 hDVh9<jhDVh9<0JUhDVh9<mHsH8DPS does not give school boards, Dan, 25 November 2009.     PAGE  Moskovska bb, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro, Tel: + 382 20 510 040, Fax: +382 20 510 041 E-mail: hra@t-com.me, www.hraction.org RSTUVWXYZ[\˻ubOKh7%hqhq@B*CJmHphsH%hqh24@B*CJmHphsH%hqh@B*CJmHphsHhxG@B*CJmHphsH%hqh3@B*CJmHphsHhx@B*CJmHphsHhx@B*CJmH phsH h3@B*CJmH phsH h3h3B*phhA@hdhwh4hw0JmHsHTUVWXYZ[\$a$gdMgd3gd3h9<mHsH21h:p7/ =!"#$% DyK http://www.hraction.org/wp-yK Phttp://www.hraction.org/wp-yX;H,]ą'cDyK bhttp://www.hraction.org/wp-content/uploads/hra-analiza_reforme_izbora_sudija_u_crnoj_gori-eng.pdfyK http://www.hraction.org/wp-content/uploads/hra-analiza_reforme_izbora_sudija_u_crnoj_gori-eng.pdfyX;H,]ą'cDyK bhttp://www.hraction.org/wp-content/uploads/hra-analiza_reforme_izbora_sudija_u_crnoj_gori-eng.pdfyK http://www.hraction.org/wp-content/uploads/hra-analiza_reforme_izbora_sudija_u_crnoj_gori-eng.pdfyX;H,]ą'c DyK http://www.hraction.org/?p=333yK Vhttp://www.hraction.org/?p=333yX;H,]ą'c*@@@ 3NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH F@F 3 Heading 1$$@&a$ CJmH sH DA@D Default Paragraph FontRi@R  Table Normal4 l4a (k@(No List6U@6 3 Hyperlink >*B*phH@H s] Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJN@N  }Footnote Text,5_GCJaJmH sH H&@!H }Footnote Reference,4_GH*bO2b w1tekst $ww]w^w`a$CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH VOBV w4clan$a$"5CJOJQJ\^JaJmH sH jORj w6naslov $<]^a$"5CJOJQJ\^JaJmH sH Oa wtxt^Or^ wtekst_1dd[$\$%B*CJOJQJ^JaJmH phsH nOn w tekst_centar$dd[$\$a$%B*CJOJQJ^JaJmH phsH *W@* wStrong5\bQ@b w Body Text 3$dh1$9DH$a$B*CJaJmHphsH\S@\ wBody Text Indent 3hx^hCJaJmH sH 4 @4 wFooter  !.)@. w Page Number4@4 4Header  !lOl x_ Single Txt_G%$nndx*$]n^na$CJaJmH sH BOB x 5_G Char Char_HmH sH tH rOr "ZX _ H_1_G9!$$ Snndh*$]n^n`5aJmH sH HO!H !ZX _ H_1_G Char5CJ_HmH sH tH <O1< C- Char Char_HmH sH tH D@BD %Q" Comment Text$CJaJmH sH >OQ> $Q" Char Char2_HmH sH tH zOz /i _ H _Ch_G9&$$ Snndh*$]n^n`5CJaJmH sH 4Oq4 /i long_text1CJaJ66 9< Char Char3CJaJhOh 9<7podnas)$<-DM a$"5CJOJQJ\^JaJmH sH | =g"$L+-011c2>?XFDG#IKK.MM PW\\\;^`afgik/mrsstvxzz|h||t  !"#$%&'()*+,-l8 ( @ > R >b!nIX[+s%_t t0123abcd12bcdCD=VWXijk~ x y EFef*+?@RSij####d%e%%%----..//00506011a3b3z3334 499::::S=T=q?r????@@+@,@CC[F\FFGGG&I'IKK1M2MNNPPQQSSTTT U U4U5USUTUUUUUWWDZEZ__ aecfccddf fIgJgjjll2m3mnnnnnqquu=w>wxxzz||~~~\L |c/c΅߅ڈۈ785ƋI֌5XYe@OR"jVژpqru000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000$0$0000000000000000000000000000!0!00000000000000000&000000000000000000000000000&0000000000000000(00000000000000000)0)0)0)0)00000000000000@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0(@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0 00@0I00@0I00@0I00@0I00@0@0@0@0@0@0I00#000000000006011a3b3z3TTT U4U5USUTUUWEZ_ aecfcc~\ |c/c΅߅ڈۈ785ƋI֌5XYe@"juK00K00 K00 K00x I0I0I00I00K00K00LIK00K00@0K00K0000@0@0@0@0@00(@0000I00I00 I00I00I00I00I00I00I00I00I00I00I00I00I00I00I00I00I00I00I00I00@00@00@00I00I00@00@00@00@00@00I00 X+ I00I00@00@00@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0I0 0@0@0I0 0PU I0 0I0 0I0 0@P00  Q 1(/7};BHM\NP\_hnv ɇ6Y`>RQVWY[\]_`bcdeghiklmoprsuvwy{}  j'8qGYfk=UTRTUXZ^afjnqtx|S !4Q$XXXX8@n(  6b </h=  #" Vn 8(   #" H$ t  h\ # #" 8`  C N h\   r WȜ?HTimes New Roman X`  C N8!   v WȜ?R Times New Roman9 !0`   C  N,"8H$    r WȜ?ATimes New Roman}"#.H   #  H$     WȜ?MONTENEGRO Times New Roman $    0 WȜ?HUMAN RIGHTS ACTION Times New Roman$8( f  S *</h= B S  ?t`(7t"Internal Data Integrity (Type 4) 1uu3O  P|OQ T?!R4u S dj T%~ U !Vo W &~ Xu Y Lh Zf[ k\ j ]Lj^*!_|\d`d~ a\!bfc h dd_e zif y g(~ h  (i L$fjk n_l$_mn oj pnq q!r +!sdu t!u|1v$y wdxw y]ezyl{||lk}lm ~,&o d iFh x x 4??""z'z'''''aarrrtt\\hhƅu"݉B^<~̖ NǗBzu      !"#$%&'()*+,-./012 :II""''''''aarrrttffrrɅxƈ)"Ee?ϖ UΗI}u  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012V*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PersonNamehttp://www.microsoft.comV2*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplacehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/_3*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagscountry-regionhttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/;$*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsaddressZ*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceTypehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/Z*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceNamehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/:#*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsStreet 4Jx323232323232332$#$#23223323223/J`d/2bdBD<=UXhk>?|CFNQ&'dfde   ! ' ) w y QRkm"# !FH)+Cfklwx%&)*./FGz{(+MNcest =NR###V$W$i$w$$$$$c%''''k+p+q+x+.//0040601111c2e2`33333333334 455S6T67799999999_:b:::z;;;; < <<<(<)<N<O<Y<Z<s<t<<<<<<<<<<<<<==R=T=z========>>>>S>W>[>i>m>n>>>>>>>>>????.?/?0?1?X?Z?p?r??????@*@,@AAAAAAAABBBBBBCCKDLDTDUDXDYDpD}DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD%E&E)E+E=EAEBEMEPEQEeEfEEEEEFF+F,FEF]FFFFFFFFFFFFFGG G G#G$GCGGGpGqGGGGGGGGGGGHH H HiHjHHHHHHHHHHHII#I'IIIIIIIIIIIlJmJKKKK%K&K1K2K|K}KKKKKKKKKKKKKLL#L%L+L,LfLhLLLLLLL-M2MAMBMMMNNQNRNNN PPQQ,S-SSSSSSSSTTTbTcTnTpTTTTTTTTTT UUU3UUUUUWWWWXXbXcXYYYYCZEZrZsZZZZZZZ[[I[J[[[\\9\:\G\I\X\^\k\l\\\^ ^:^=^k^l^ __b_c_h_i_`!`q`s`w`y`a aZa[aCbDbgbibbbWcXcecfcickctcucccccccccdd]drdneoe}e~eeeeeeeeef fOfPfgfhfjfkfrfsf~ffffffffffffggGgJgVgWgogqgggggggmhnhhhhhhhiiiiiijjjjjjk kEkFkllllmmmm.m3mnnnnnnnnoooopp qqqq$q%q7q8qdqeq{q|qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqrr1r3rHrIrTrUrgrhrrrrrrrssrsusssssssssOtPtutvtttttttttuu&u'uZu\ucuduuuuuuuuuuuuuuuvv!v"v%v&vMvNvlvmvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvww w wzjzkzzzzzzzzzzz"{#{*{+{5{6{^{_{i{j{{{{{{{{{|!|)|*|9|:|h|j|m|n|||||||||||||||}}!}"}Q}R}r}t}}}d~e~p~r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!",tz{!"&/239 ABprux~"$47noŋKՌ׌$%=?5\y{ՑבcquzÓē?QYZU]%-~ "%&()02FI]_pu/J`d02adBD<=UXhk} w y Df)+>###c%.//00406011`3}3334 499::R=T=p?r??@*@,@CCEGG%I'IKK0M2MNN PPQQSST U3UUUUUWWCZEZ__a adcfccccdf fHgJgjjll1m3mnnnnqquuwxxzz||~~LT}/2و47ŋKՌ֌4[d?QDUou3333333333DDefkk"%GM33~~\\LLژ)01Fu~uvN9p]vLY5^j5e`*@lxn.rx!^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.^`o(. ^`hH. L^`LhH. P P ^P `hH.   ^ `hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. `L`^``LhH.^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.h ^`o(hH. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.e`LY5rxN9@lxv                  qĈ                                   QPx3e|ZX r` p %9<MLY'Lz'_03 >?'EQ@NTs] _>`Sb_;e/i lP*qQqn t-uvexU[|n~A@!g24h-Ek'5ewkzbqC(sajDQ"$3}f"xs~N -\d`xC-p"{RGLmJ4=}A-o-xG7i!~uG 0Y0@P 4[[Wt@8@@Unknown-Gz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial5& zaTahoma"1&ލ&c&l@l@!4~~2qXZ ?32Usre-$      Oh+'0x  ( 4 @ LX`hpUsreNormal-30Microsoft Office Word@J.@l"N@v+@dSl՜.+,D՜.+,, hp|  @~  Title 8@ _PID_HLINKSA: http://www.hraction.org/?p=333wezbhttp://www.hraction.org/wp-content/uploads/hra-analiza_reforme_izbora_sudija_u_crnoj_gori-eng.pdfwezbhttp://www.hraction.org/wp-content/uploads/hra-analiza_reforme_izbora_sudija_u_crnoj_gori-eng.pdfw9:http://www.hraction.org/wp-w  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry FSData 1TableVWordDocument4SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjq  FMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89qRoot Entry FTData 1TableVWordDocument4՜.+,D՜.+,, hp|  @~  Title 8@ _PID_HLINKSA: http://www.hraction.org/?p=333wezbhttp://www.hraction.org/wp-content/uploads/hra-analiza_reforme_izbora_sudija_u_crnoj_gori-eng.pdfwezbhttp://www.hraction.org/wp-content/uploads/hra-analiza_reforme_izbora_sudija_u_crnoj_gori-eng.pdfw9:http://www.hraction.org/wp-wSummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjq